Waking Up from Consensus Trance

I know I said I wouldn’t be writing, but couldn’t help myself. I gave my blog a face lift “present” and decided to write to all of you.

We are all walking around in a trance, induced by our culture, our upbringing, the media, and those of importance surrounding us.

I’ve been curious about why I’ve been so angry at the news reports, of late, telling us that we’ve been suffering ‘great economic trouble’ for the last year or more. I thought it had to do with my outrage at the lies the mainstream media’s been telling us, but I’ve come to think of it as something different. Something much more profound. Something that can keep us all a bit saner as we watch this cultural transformation slide into nasty places.

I was angry about these current articles, because, despite my intellectual conviction about the state of our economy, and where it was headed, I was still impacted by the “consensus trance.” Emotionally, I could not entirely embrace my convictions, because it would have set me too far at a distance from those around me. These events, outlined by the “heretics” years ago, were labeled as “absurd,” “paranoid” or “crazy thinking.” Now, they are accepted as givens, an “obvious” conclusion to a “clearly destructive” set of events that “anyone could see coming.”

Charley Tart called it the “consensus trance,” and you can read a concise article about it here.

To him, the idea of “normal consciousness” is the kind of convenient fiction illustrated by the famous folktale of “the emperor’s new clothes.” Together, human groups agree on which of their perceptions should be admitted to awareness (hence, consensus), then they train each other to see the world in that way and only in that way (hence trance).

As a young clinician, I was drawn to hynotherapy and to studying the works of the all-time master of the art, Milton Erickson. According to Tart’s work, himself a psychologist:

“Then I began to talk to the subject. Researchers give the style of talking the special name of ‘hypnotic induction procedure,’ but basically it was just talking. The subject was given no drugs, was not in a special environment, had nothing external done to his brain — and yet in twenty minutes I could drastically change the universe he lived in. With a few words, the subject could not lift his arm. With a few more he heard voices talking when no one was there. A few more words and he could open his eyes and see something that no one else could see, or, with the right suggestion, a real object in plain sight in the room would be invisible to him.”

One of Dr. Erickson’s experiments was to hypnotize some subjects, while asking others to “pretend” to be hypnotized. He then set up a walkway, where a chair was placed, and asked both to “see no obstacles in their path.” Those who were actually hypnotized, simply walked around the chair, and later, when questioned, denied that they had avoided anything, insisting instead that they had walked straight ahead. Those “pretending,” “tripped” over the chair.

Erickson later experimented by having subjects do things to themselves which were against their own self-interest, and then having them forget the experience. What he learned was that, although these subjects could not articulate the reason, they all appeared to avoid the “opportunity” to be hypnotized once again by Erickson. From this, Erickson concluded that while hypnosis can have a temporary negative effect, ultimately, people avoid repeating these unpleasant experiences, if they can avoid them.

I recognized, as I read about the consensus trance, that my anger actually arose from my own susceptibility to this powerful cultural force. While hypnotherapists are limited in time and ethical considerations, cultural conditioning occurs 24/7. Parents, then later teachers, preachers, peers and media programs all reinforce a steady stream of induction, that can allow reasonable people to believe unreasonable things. These beliefs are shaped by powerful political forces, and benefit people with real names and addresses, while creating hardship for a much larger segment of the world’s population. Rather than trust our own internal compass, we are “hypnotized” into believing whatever is being fed to us. The fear of social ostracism is so great, we become alienated from ourselves to keep our sense of “belonging.” Yet, throughout it all, (just as with Erickson’s self-inflicting subjects) the pervasive levels of stress, depression, anxiety, worry, insomnia, or free-floating rage, remind us that something’s wrong.

We become conditioned to accept some elements of life as “real” and some as “illusion.” Our mental models of the world, the structural cognitive scaffolding, if you will, allow, like a round hole, to allow some elements of experience to penetrate, while keeping other ones out. The effects, for most of us, is an automatized daze. It causes some in the Peak Oil community to refer to others as “sheeple.”

“It is a fundamental mistake of man’s to think that he is alive, when he has merely fallen asleep in life’s waiting room.” Indries Shah

A whole host of what psychologists call “defense mechanisms” help maintain this trance, by warding off alternative views. And, as quickly as these ideas were once rejected, this alternative view becomes the accepted reality, as if it was “forever thus.”

Notions of forever expanding economic growth, or the impossibility of planetary destruction are now considered “crazy thinking,” and the push toward consensus trance is so strong, that even respected scientists will lay out the terrifying facts, but end their articles with “the happy chapter,” which they, themselves, will admit, in person, is phantasmagorical. So great is the demand for magical thinking among us, that we, like great cultures that have gone before us, will destroy the very elements of our survival, while framing the behavior as “sane” and “desirable.”

Waking Up

How can anybody distinguish, then, between dream, hypnotic trance, and reality? Dehypnotization, the procedure of breaking out of the normal human state of awareness, according to both mystics and hypnotists, is a matter of direct mental experience. The method can be learned, and that’s the nutshell description of the esoteric wisdom of the ages.

“The answer, Tart has concluded, could come in the form of “mindfulness training ” — a variety of exercises for elevating awareness by deliberately paying closer-than-usual attention to the mundane details of everyday life. Gurdjieff called it “self-remembering,” and many flavors of psychotherapist, East and West, use it. Mindfulness is a skill that can be honed by the right approach to what is happening right in front of you: “Be here now” as internal gymnastics. Working, eating, waiting for a traffic light to change can furnish opportunities for mindfulness. Observe what you are feeling, thinking, perceiving, don’t get hung up on judging it, just pay attention. Tart thinks this kind of self-observation — noticing the automatization — is the first step toward waking up.”

I was speaking of this exact phenomenon to a friend a few days ago. Ordinary life is composed of a set of behaviors that we repeat each day, over and over. We awake from a sleep state, and we have awareness of ourselves. We leave the bed in a certain way, put our feet into slippers, walk to the bathroom to carry out our ablutions, enter our kitchens to eat the first meal of the day. These tasks of daily living appear as a “given” and are seldom paid attention to as they deserve. For some of us, each action provides enormous pleasure, while for others, they are painful and bothersome. What’s curious is that, beyond a certain level of survival needs, the physical details of how we carry out these tasks appear irrelevant to the satisfaction they deliver. In fact, too much “stuff” brings a complexity to one’s life that often detracts from true satisfaction. What appears to be more essential is the consciousness we bring to these tasks.

Does Tart believe there is a way out of this unconsciousness?

    “Yes, I do,” he replied. “We are indoctrinated to believe that intellect is what makes humans great, and emotions are primitive leftovers from our jungle ancestors that interfere with our marvelous logical minds. It is possible to train people to base decisions on the appropriate mixture of emotional, intellectual and body-instinctive intelligence. Compassion and empathy are emotions, and I agree with the Buddhists that these emotions are highly evolved, not primitive. With enough training in self-observation, we can develop a new kind of intelligence to bear on the world. Everyday life is quite an interesting place if you pay attention to it.”

Putting attention to your emotional world and bodily reality is particularly important when surrounded by one’s family-of-origin. In the consensus trance, we tend to forget that we are adults with agency, and can fall back into destructive patterns from childhood. Families often have rigid roles such as the “star son,” the “scatterbrain daughter” or the “family mascot.” These roles continue long after they fit the individuals assigned to them (if they ever did…)

Our emotions and bodily sensations can give us a “wake up call” that all is not right, and with consciousness, we can do something about it. We can redirect, or refuse to engage in unpleasant conversation, or alternatively, robustly argue our point. We can slow down our eating and drinking. We can call bullies out, when they are being verbally abusive, or simply walk out of the room. We can exit an upsetting environment, even if dessert has not been served. In other words, we can awake from our trance and begin to live a more genuine, adult life.

And, as I’ve done, we can take a look at our emotional reactions, and consider them clues to something we might not intellectually grasp. So many of us are being abused in our consensus trance daily lives, and we sense it down to our very being. In an attempt to distance ourselves from what we know, instinctively, emotionally, is right, desirable, sane, we self-medicate or act out. These signs of stress can tell us it is time for a shift in our consciousness, and perhaps a wake-up call from the illusion we call “reality.”

Happy Holidays all.

Peak Oil Ping-Pong and Dodging the Consensus Trance

Dear Peak Shrink

I’ve devoted today to exploring the Peak Oil Blues site. As part of that, I’d like to share with you and other readers my trip down that road. There’ll be commonalities and differences.

I stumbled across the peak oil issue earlier this year, probably eight or nine months ago. It seems that a lifetime has gone by since. I was Net-surfing, following up on my then current interest – velomobiles. I was reading up on fuel efficiency, when I saw a link that warned it would lead me somewhere scary. It did. It took me to Life After the Oil Crash. (not a Neil Young album)

Instantly I was convinced – no denial, no doubts, no dilly-dallying. Rather, I was dismayed that I hadn’t seen the writing on the wall much earlier. It all clicked. I grokked it. How could I have been so blind! Another emotion I felt at the time was exhilaration. Some ‘doomsters’ refer to their visits to P.O. sites as a peak oil pornography fix, and I can understand why they would do so!

I underwent a period of frantic exploration, tagging sites, half-reading articles, joining groups, meeting up (online) with others and viewing documentaries. Like a ping-pong ball, my state of mind bounced to the tune of whatever the predominant psychological slant of the author was. And yet . . . what about those advertisements they posted for books and devices that would help you weather the apocalypse? What were the webmasters’ vested interests? I had to weigh up, evaluate and sift through information that was not always impartial. (one site had a link that led to a spiel which urged me to invest in Uranium!)

To cut a longer story short, I tumbled a turbulent ride for a spell. Luckily my wife came aboard quite soon – in contrast to another writer to Peak Oil Blues. I’m extremely relieved about that. You see, I haven’t the knack of explaining and convincing other people. My best guess is that I have a highly-functioning form of Asperger’s Syndrome which ain’t all bad – in fact; on the whole I am glad that I have it! But it does mean that I have to put up with quite a high level of free-floating anxiety. You get my meaning? Peak oil doesn’t exactly help with that!

At this stage there are specific preparations that I can make (I have the ability, opportunity, know-how and our mortgage is almost paid off). For all of my life I’ve been interested in voluntary simplicity and self-sufficiency. I can live off the smell of an oily rag (ha-ha) and have kept myself in excellent shape (I’ve walked one hundred miles non-stop). In 2008 I’ve elected to work part-time only, so as to allow me to research and effect further changes to my lifestyle.

I live in one of the few regions of the world that is not in population overshoot, and within a year or two we’ll move to that part of the country that I’ve ascertained will probably be best in terms of climate, resources and population. I’m convinced that community is the key factor to consider.

As with Asperger’s, peak oil comes with – or it did for me – many positives. That may sound surprising, but after having read over two dozen books by people like James Howard Kunstler, Richard Heinberg, Jared Diamond and others, I have a much better understanding of global economy, geopolitics, history, civilization etc. I’m very stimulated by the ideas of Daniel Quinn, Dimitry Orlov and Ran Prieur, and that has vastly expanded my world. I’m glad peak oil has brought me into touch with minds of their caliber.

On the other hand, I am determined not to let peak oil take over my life. On the universal scale it is, according to my perspective, a trivial matter, ultimately.

I see life quite differently to most other people. Eckhart Tolle, Neale Donald Walsch and maybe a few others also have an inkling (think “What the Bleep Do We Know?”) but I’m trying to extend their thinking further. I feel it is of the greatest importance not to seek the meaning of life, but to live personally according to the implications once you’ve discovered that meaning. Peak oil spurs me. It has jerked me out of the consensus trance.

At this point you may well wish to pass me over to another shrink . . ! Sorry for going off on a tangent. What I’m trying to say here is that I’ve dealt, or am dealing, with peak oil and that now I’m trying to maintain a balance. I refuse to let it dominate my life, and I guess that this is the message I’d like to leave for others here, that you endeavor to live your life in spite of, or in the face of, or within the confines of that problem.

It’s funny, but I haven’t looked at a velomobile website for ages!

Stabilizing Balance

**********************

Dear S.B.

If I could emphasize two points from your story, it is the importance of balance, and finding one’s own moral center in all of this transition. For months now, I’ve been increasingly concerned that as things get economically tougher here in the USA, there will be individuals or groups offering various forms of “salvation,” whether it be spiritual, economic, or cultural. Miracle “solutions” will be offered for a price. The simple, cost-free, step-by-step, boring, incremental answers may be disregarded if we’re promised a chance to “help the world AND use our fuel!”

Consensus trance can also occur among alternative communities, as well as mainstream ones. Even on the Earth, upheavals come in different forms–drought in this place, downpours and flooding in that one. Many people will offer “answers,” but if they offer “universal” answers, run, don’t walk the other way.

Thinking for yourself is difficult, that’s why so few people do it, as a great wit once said. However, thinking for yourself, investigating your own circumstances, learning all you can that relates to your own values, locale, climate, crops, family life, is not only important to do, it will allow you to come to an answer that fits you better than any book, guru, or website can promise. It will be the answers you’ve developed, after struggle and confusion, that fits you AND your family, with their input. It will be the solution you’ve reached, after listening to the critics, the ones you strongly disagree with, the ones who’s values you reject. Allow yourself to be exposed to all of it, and from it, let a complicated, unclear, confusing, “good enough” solution come out of it that you are willing to live with.

And what you say is usually a good rule of thumb: Cui Bono–follow the money. This is not to imply that anyone who is making money is “bad,” but just that as money comes rolling in, there can be an investment in continuing to make that happen, even in the face of contradictory information. That is human nature. I have met very few people in the Peak Oil community who have “cashed in,” because of their involvement in Peak Oil. Nonetheless, it is useful to ask yourself whether there is a vested interest in promoting a point of view. I’d be particularly skeptical of those who refuse to even offer you their name, while asking you to accept their advice. “Fancy Pants” might have valuable things to say, but you have no idea who he or she is and who they work for. What’s more, that handle tells you that they choose to keep their true identity hidden (sometimes for very good reasons.)

None of us have “the answers.” Each of us have our own answers, or our piece of the puzzle that we can put together with other people to see a broader view. Thanks for adding your own piece.

Kathy aka “Fancy Pants” Peak Shrink